Legal Opinion
City of O'Neill v. CONSUMERS PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1966No. 36090PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action to determine whether or not an agreement between the City of O’Neill and Consumers Public Power District was valid and enforceable. The district court declared the agreement to be valid and enforceable, and dismissed the petition in intervention filed by Loup River Public Power District.
The City of O’Neill, Nebraska, will hereafter be referred to as O’Neill; Consumers Public Power District will be referred to as Consumers; and Loup River Public Power District will be referred to as Loup.
On March 17, 1964, an agreement was executed by O’Neill and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- E. K. Buck Retail Stores v. HarkertNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Kirchner v. GastNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Nelson-Johnston & Doudna v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wittler v. BaumgartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Blankenship v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Colman v. Colman Foundation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Lanphier v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.