Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on two separate but related motions: (1) the motion of Claimant Pavel Lazarenko, a.k.a. Pavlo Lazarenko (“Lazarenko”), for reconsideration of the Court’s January 10, 2017 Opinion and Order that, inter alia, denied Lazarenko-.leave to amend his answer to assert an Eighth Amendment excessive fines affirmative defense, see United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, 229 F.Supp.3d 62 (D.D.C. 2017); and (2) the motion of Lazarenko’s children, Claimants .Alexander, Ekaterina,, and Lecia La-zarenko…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018