Legal Opinion

H. Koehler & Co. v. Reinheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by H. Koehler & Co. against Isaac Reinheimer. From a judgment dismissing the complaint (45 N. Y. Supp. 337), plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the general law of 1848, and the objects for which it is organized are the manufacture, and sale of various kinds of ales and beer. In the month of November, 1890, certain infants, the owners of a building in this city, were, by their special guardian, about to lease the premises to one Hyland, to be used as a saloon for the sale of beer. The plaintiff corporation had agreed to guaranty the performance of the covenants of the lease by Hyland.. Before that was done, • however, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant under his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Holmes v. . WillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Holm v. Claus Lipsius Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Fuld v. Burr Brewing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Depot Realty Syndicate v. Enterprise Brewing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Aaronson v. David Mayer Brewing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1899
  5. Depot Realty Syndicate v. Enterprise Brewing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API