Legal Opinion

Aaronson v. David Mayer Brewing Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 6, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Rachel Aaronson against the David Mayer Brewing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff-, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtScotchman, J.

The plaintiff’s complaint alleges that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York; that on January 23,1894, the plaintiff entered into a lease with one Samuel Albert, as lessee, by which she demised unto the said lessee the store basement and two floors above the store of premises No. -65 Hester street, New York City, for a term of three years from May 1, 1894, at the yearly rental of $3,200, to be paid in equal monthly payments in advance; that the defendant corporation guarantied in writing the payment of the rents and covenants in said lease contained;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitford v. . LaidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Holm v. Claus Lipsius Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Powers v. Schlicht Heat, Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. H. Koehler & Co. v. ReinheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Fuld v. Burr Brewing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Timm v. Grand Rapids Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Timm v. Grand Rapids Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API