Legal Opinion
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Invamed Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 23, 2000No. 99-1466PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
213 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. and SYNTEX (U.S.A.) INC.,Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
INVAMED INCORPORATED, DANBURY PHARMACAL INC., PUREPAC PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., GENPHARM, INC.,
and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL USA, INC., Defendants, and TORPHARM, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
99-1466
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DECIDED: MAY 23, 2000
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Judge William H. WallsJohn C. Vassil, Morgan & Finnegan, L.L.P., of New York, New York, argued for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter ABCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Cambridge Products, Ltd., and Naremco, Inc. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rohm and Haas Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Brotech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Callaway Golf Co. v. SlazengerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- LG Display Co., Ltd. v. AU Optronics Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Bose Corp. v. JBL, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.