Legal Opinion
Williams v. Verizon Washington, D.C., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 31, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Defendant Verizon Washington, D.C., Inc. (“Verizon”) asserts that, during the discovery-phase of the instant litigation, Plaintiff Rickie Williams and his counsel Arinderjit Dhali produced evidence that “should have placed Plaintiffs counsel on notice that certain critical allegations in the Complaint are false” and “that the claims made in the Complaint are neither grounded in fact nor warranted under the law.” (Def.’s Mot. for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Howard B. Samuels, and Terence P. Boyle and James A. Nations, Cross-Appellees v. Jack Wilder, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Miller v. BittnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Hilton Hotels Corporation D/B/A Capital Hilton Hotel v. Alan Banov, Hilton Hotels Corporation D/B/A Capital Hilton Hotel v. Alan BanovCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hedgeye Risk Management, LLC v. HeldmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Williams v. Verizon Washington, D.C., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018