The Susquehanna
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Suits in admiralty by Harry G. Smith and Eugene E. Smith against the Steamship Susquehanna, the Susquehanna Steamship Company, claimant, and against the steamship Schuylkill, the Schuylkill Steamship Company, claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
Harry G. Smith and Eugene E. Smith, naval architects and marine surveyors, were employed by the owners of the lake steamers Susquehanna and Schuylkill to furnish plans and specifications for their alteration, so as to fit them for ocean navigation and to superintend the making of the said alterations by Buffalo Dry Dock Company. The principal work was in lengthening the steamers. These libels were filed against the steamers, respectively, to cover an alleged balance due in the case of the Susquehanna^ of $5,741.93 and of $6,020.41 in the case of the Schuylkill, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People's Ferry Company of Boston v. BeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- The Monte A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Logue Stevedoring Corp. v. The Dalzellance. The Grace A. Dalzell. The Lloyd H. Dalzell. The Joseph AlstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Ocean Engine & Boiler Works, Inc. v. Olympia Shipping Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1920
- The City of SingaporeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.