Legal Opinion

Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1924No. 342PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The libelant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York. It is engaged in the business of repairing1 ships, and lias its plant and principal place of business in the borough of Brooklyn, in the Eastern district of New York. It is one of the largest ship repair plants in the harbor of New York. It filed its libel in a cause of contract, civil and maritime, in the Eastern district of New York against the United States. It alleged that the United States, directly or indirectly, through the United States Shipping Board, or the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Kirsch v. . TozierNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Petrain v. KiernanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. The SusquehannaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. The Sea LarkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  2. Tampa Ship Repair and Dry Dock Company, Inc. v. Esso Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Findley v. Red Top Super Markets, Inc. The Queen AnneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. The A. S. ShermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1930
  5. Lindbar, Incorporated, Claimant-Appellant v. St. Louis Fuel & Supply Company, Inc., Libelant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API