Legal Opinion

Bryson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1936No. A-9030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be incarcerated in the county jail for 30 days. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, overruled, and defendant appeals.

Before the trial began, the defendant, Dollie Bryson, filed her motion to suppress the evidence, setting forth several grounds as a reason for suppressing same; the first assignment being that the evidence was obtained by the state while the officers were searching the home of the defendant, Dollie Bryson,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Myer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Shanafelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Smart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API