Legal Opinion

Mydlarz v. Palmer/Duncan Construction Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1984No. 82-98PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

Johann J. Mydlarz appeals a Cascade County District Court judgment, based upon the jury’s special verdict, in favor of Palmer/Duncan Construction (respondent) and Rice Motors (respondent) in an action to recover damages for injuries he received in a fall from a ladder at the construction site of a new Rice Motors building. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Rice Motors, an automobile dealership, let bids and awarded contracts for building a new sales facility in Great Falls, Montana. Rice awarded a substantial portion of the contract to Palmer/Duncan. It awarded electrical, mechanical,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Louis v. BarenfangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Caddy v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. State v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lauman v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Porter v. GalarneauMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Walker v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kelley v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Mickelson v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API