Legal Opinion

Bank of Pinehurst v. Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe procedural question presented by this appeal arose upon the following facts :

Plaintiff bank obtained a money judgment against the defendants. Execution issued and the homestead of defendant P. L. Gardner was laid off. The sheriff advertised and sold the excess and the property was hid off by counsel for Ruth W. Gardner for fifty dollars. "Within ten days thereafter the plaintiff, the judgment creditor, posted advance bid, and resale was ordered. No notice of second sale was given defendant P. L. Gardner, the judgment debtor, or to Ruth W. Gardner. After advertisement the property was sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Williams v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Williams v. Charles F. Dunn & Sons Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Scott Register Co. v. . HoltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Walston v. W. H. Applewhite & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API