Legal Opinion

State v. Com's Humboldt Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1892No. 1352PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The relator, as clerk of Humboldt county, was, prior to 1892, entitled to a salary of two thousand four hundred dollars per annum, to be allowed by the board of commissioners of that county. This was, however, by the act of March 9, 1891 (Stat. 1891, p. 30), reduced to one thousand two hundred dollars per annum, to be paid by a warrant drawn by the auditor upon the salary fund. He claims that this act is unconstitutional, and this is the question involved in this action.

1. The first ground upon which this claim is made is that both the act and its title embrace more than one subject, to-wit:…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. State ex rel. Clarke v. IrwinNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Ackley School District v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Evans v. JobNevada Supreme Court · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pioneer Irrigation District v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. DolanIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. BartineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API