Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1985No. 2-684A157PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

After a trial to the court Jack N. Hammond, Jr. was convicted of child molesting, a class C felony. 1 From this conviction Hammond appeals and presents the following two issues:(1) Whether the trial court erred by admitting into evidence an incriminating statement Hammond made to police officers investigating the crime; and(2) Whether the State's evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

I

Hammond contends that the statement he gave to police was not preceded by an effective advisement of his rights against self-incrimination and right to counsel as guaranteed by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pinkston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Tapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Yurina v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shelly M. Phipps v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nelson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hopper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Shanks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API