Legal Opinion

Tapp v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1971No. 769S167PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.

Defendant (Appellant) was convicted in a trial before the court, without the intervention of a jury, of assault and battery with intent to gratify sexual desires under Acts of 1905, ch. 169, § 354, as amended by Acts of 1951, ch. 277, § 1, and Acts of 1961, ch. 321, § 1, (1956 Repl., 1970 Supp. Burns’ § 10-403), which is as follows:

“Assault and battery. — Whoever in a rude, insolent or angry manner, unlawfully touches another, is guilty of an assault and battery, and on conviction, shall be fined not more than one thousand, dollars [$1,000], to which may be added imprisonment in the county…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Grimm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hanrahan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Herman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Snider v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Borosh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hobson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API