Haun v. Haun

CROW, Judge.

Helen Louise Haun (“Helen”) appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage to David Robert Haun (“David”). Her sole complaint is that the trial court, in dividing the marital property, erred in its treatment of David’s “future retirement benefits.” That error, insists Helen, rendered the apportionment of marital property unfair and inequitable.

Helen, born June 21, 1940, and David, born July 6, 1936, were married February 11, 1961. Their only offspring, Ruth Ann, was born June 30, 1971. 1 The trial court granted Helen custody of Ruth Ann and ordered David to pay child support.…