Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scacchetti

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2007No. 2006-2264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David J. Scacchetti of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0014117, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent’s license to practice for two years, staying the last 18 months on conditions, based on findings that he violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude) and 1-102(A)(6) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law). On review, we find that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScacchettiOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScacchettiOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API