Legal Opinion
Rockwell International Cor v. SDL, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 29, 2000No. C95-1729 MHPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, Chief Judge.
On May 22, 1995, plaintiffs Rockwell International Corporation and Rockwell Science Center, Inc. (collectively “Rockwell”) filed this action against SDL, Inc. (“SDL”) alleging infringement of United States Patent Number 4,368,098 (“the ’098 patent”). Rockwell now moves for partial summary judgment that claims 19, 30, 50, 56, and 72 are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. section 102. On a cross-motion for summary judgment, SDL seeks a ruling that, except for the elements identified by Rockwell in its present motion, all of the elements of claims 19, 30, 50, 56,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Selfcare Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015