Longs Drug Stores v. Howe
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
By special action, petitioners challenge an order of the trial court which required production of statements and reports. There being no remedy by appeal and the issues raised in this special action being sufficiently important to justify review, Jolly v. Superior Court of Pinal County, 112 Ariz. 186, 188, 540 P.2d 658, 660 (1975); Zimmerman v. Superior Court, 98 Ariz. 85, 87, 402 P.2d 212, 213 (1965), we accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(4).
William A. Sorman (Sorman) and Toria Vanee Sorman brought an action in the Superior Court of Maricopa County…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.