Legal Opinion
Cupolo v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 29, 1997No. C 96-02991 CWPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY • INJUNCTION
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ann Cupolo, et al, move for a preliminary injunction. Defendants Bay Area Rapid Transit and its General Manager, Sherwood Wakeman, (collectively “BART”) oppose the motion. The matter was heard on September 12, 1997. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court GRANTS the motion.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Posture and Requested Relief
In this action, Plaintiffs allege that BART has systematically failed to provide individuals with mobility…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- 21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 990, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,594 Ina P. Anderson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- Carrillo v. Schneider Logistics, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- ProtectMarriage. Com v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.