Sullivan Industries v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSilberman, Circuit Judge
I agree that. substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that New *906Sullivan committed an unfair labor practice when it refused to bargain with the union in August. But the second issue in- this case can be analyzed a good deal more manageably than does the majority, and once that is done, I think our reviewing role is more modest than my colleagues assume. The question presented under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169 (NLRA), is, at its core, rather straightforward: if a successor employer refuses to recognize and bargain with an incumbent union in violation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.