Pro Metal Building Systems, Inc. v. T. E. Driskell Grading Co.

Carley, Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff subcontractor brought suit against appellant-defendant general contractor to recover for certain “extra work” that it asserted had not been contemplated under the parties’ written agreement. The case was submitted to a jury and a verdict was returned for appellee. Appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. or new trial was denied and it appeals.

1. In several related enumerations of error appellant raises the general grounds. Appellant first asserts that appellee was already required to perform the “extra work” pursuant to the clear and unambiguous terms of the…