Legal Opinion

MacOn Chrysler-Plymouth v. Sentell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1986No. 72221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellee purchased an allegedly new car from appellant automobile dealer. On the day of the purchase, appellee noticed a spot on the hood where the paint was dull. Appellant’s sales manager informed appellee that this condition was typical in new cars. Appellee was told to bring the car back the next day to be buffed. When buffing failed to correct the problem, the sales manager offered to have the car repainted. Appellee, not wanting a repainted car, refused the offer. The sales manager then had the original hood replaced.

The following Spring, appellee noticed that the paint on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. JenquinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Horne v. Claude Ray Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Reliance Insurance v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Smith v. MilikinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rivers v. BMW of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Armstrong v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Henderson v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Thompson v. Huckabee Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Bennett v. D. L. Claborn Buick, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API