Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Superior Packing Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1945No. Civ. No. 672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The defendant maintains and operates a beef slaughter house and plant at St. Paul, *14Minnesota. It does not can, cure, or process meat. Its chief market is to customers in Boston, Washington, and other large cities in the East. All of the meat sold in the East is shipped in refrigerator cars which usually will hold about 25,000 pounds. Meat packed in boxes and barrels and shipped in refrigerator cars will weigh much more. The alleged violation of the so-called carload discount regulations took place between October 6, 1943, and October 4, 1944. The shipments concerned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. American Brewery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  2. Rosensweig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. Heinz v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Superior Packing Co. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Bowles v. Arcade Inv. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  3. Chatman v. WeDriveU, IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Jay Becton Briley v. Century Arms, Inc.; Century International Arms, Inc.; and Canik USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API