Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Galt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Dwight C. Haven, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This is a proceeding brought under sections 57 and 58 of the Local Improvement act (Hurd’s Stat. 1905, p. 418,) to pay the unpaid balance of the cost of a cement sidewalk. On July 20, 1903, the city council of appellant passed an ordinance for the construction of said sidewalk on both sides of Evanston avenue from Devon avenue to the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul railroad and on the east side of Sheridan road between certain points, and provided that it should be paid for by special assessment. A petition was filed in.the county court of Cook county for the levy of such special assessment,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clarke v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. City of Chicago v. NoonanIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Peoria v. OhlIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Gage v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Enid v. GensmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. City of Mattoon v. StumpIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People ex rel. Zilm v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Chicago v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. City of Mattoon v. StumpIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API