Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Marsh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1930No. 27643PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This proceeding is strictly statutory. It is not a mandamus proceeding but is somewhat akin thereto, as stated by Judge Good in his opinion in State v. Marsh, 117 Neb. 579. In respect of the relief asked, this particular case is rather a mandatory injunction. It was instituted pursuant to the provisions of section 2119, Comp. St. 1922, as amended by section 3, ch. 108, Laws 1925, now known as section *28832-1129, Comp. St. 1929. So far as applicable, the statute is as follows:

“All certificates of nomination or nomination statements, which are in apparent conformity with the provisions of this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waggoner v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State ex rel. O'Hearn v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Hollon v. CenterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  4. Seawell v. GiffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Matter of DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Daniels v. CavnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Creighton St. Joseph Regional Hospital v. Nebraska Tax Equalization & Review CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Kusler v. SinnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Donohoe v. ShearerWashington Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API