Hollon v. Center
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 20 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. 1. All provisions of the statute are mandatory upon the persons who are intrusted with -their execution and.such officers.are liable for their violation. ' McCreary on Elections, p. 127; Bowers v. Smith (Mo.), 33 Am.
Read the full summary
Case 20 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. 1. All provisions of the statute are mandatory upon the persons who are intrusted with -their execution and.such officers.are liable for their violation. ' McCreary on Elections, p. 127; Bowers v. Smith (Mo.), 33 Am. State Reps., 501; State eco reL, Brooks v. Fran-scham (Mont.) 40 Pacific Rep., 1. 2. Under the statute it is a condition precedent of the right of a nominee to have- his name printed upon the official ballot that he.shall file with the county clerk a certificate stating certain designated facts and solemnly acknowledged…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lewis
Appellees, alleging in tbeir petition that at a primary election, held September 19, 1896, under authority of the *121executive committee oil the Democratic party of Wolfe county, they were nominated as candidates for various named offices, brought this action in the Clark Circuit Court October 22, 1897, for a writ of mandamus, requiring appellant, county court clerk, to cause printed on the official ballots to be prepared by him and used in said county at the November election, 1897, their respective names as candidates for said offices, as follows: Gr. T. Center, for county judge; J. F.…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Skaggs v. Fyffe, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Koella v. State Ex Rel. MoffettTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Smith v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Anderson v. FalleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Soper v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.