Legal Opinion

People v. Dixon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 2003No. C042734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case, we hold that a general condition of probation, requiring a defendant to report by mail to his probation officer, is not a drug-related condition of probation under Proposition 36. We also hold that, in sentencing a probationer who violated such a condition, the trial court properly applied the presumption against granting probation contained in Penal Code section 1203, subdivision (e)(4) (defendant who has suffered two prior felony convictions in this state is presumptively ineligible for probation). (Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. In Re MehdizadehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HerbertHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. Blancas CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API