Legal Opinion

State v. Heaton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1899No. 3043PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior Oourt, King County. — Hon. William Hickman Moore, Judgé.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, J.

The defendant, respondent here, was indicted for forgery hy the grand jury of King county. A motion to set aside the indictment was made hy counsel for defendant, on several grounds. The superior court sustained the motion upon the third ground,—

“ That there were present before the grand jury during the investigation of the charge against the defendant persons other than the grand jurors and those required or permitted by law, to-wit, special counsel appointed by the court.”

There are three judges of the superior court in King county. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meister v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Sneed v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. BemisMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Sayles v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Seattle Gas & Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1908
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API