Wilson v. Brannan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff appealed from the order refusing the injunction. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Curre y, J.
This case has come to this Court on an appeal from an order refusing to grant an injunction. The respondent being about to sell at auction certain personal property, mortgaged or pledged to him by the appellant, the latter filed a complaint to prevent the sale, and obtained an order requiring respondent to show cause why an injunction should not issue as prayed for, and a further order temporarily restraining the sale. The respondent appeared and showed cause, and thereupon the injunction was refused and the temporary restraining order discharged.
The facts of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith & Hoe v. AckerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
- Patchin v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Brown v. Bement & StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Brown v. LipscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Wright v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Everett v. BuchananSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1880
- Meeker v. WaldronNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Ely v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.