Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Sarausad
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 26, 2001No. 45550-8-IPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
— Following a drive-by shooting, Cesar Sarausad II was convicted of second degree (intentional) murder, two counts of attempted murder in the second degree, and assault in the second degree while armed with a firearm. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal in an unpublished opinion.1 In this personal restraint petition, Sarausad contends, inter alia, that although the accomplice liability instructions given at his trial complied with the requirements of State v. Roberts, 142 Wn.2d 471, 14 P.3d 713 (2000), an additional clarifying instruction should have been given, based on the State’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Manrique v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Waddington v. SarausadSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. McCrevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- In Re DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Personal Restraint of DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cesar Sarausad v. Carol Porter, Cesar Sarausad v. Carol PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.