Legal Opinion

Williams v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court.— JIoN. W. G. Clem-. ENTS, Judge. ActioN to recover damages for personal injury. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Weavee, J.—

At the date of the accident, plaintiff was a rural mail carrier, whose route, beginning at Sigourney, crossed the line of defendant’s road about a mile from the station at said town. The morning train passing Sigourney usually arrived before plaintiff started upon his trip, but on the morning in question it was late, and he was aware of the fact. The highway along which he drove crossed the railway track at a somewhat sharp angle, making the distance from the boundary of the right of way to the track, measured along the highway, about seventy feet. A telegraph pole stands by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beauerle v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Graybill v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Beemer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Landis v. Inter-Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Ballard v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Wheeler v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API