Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Des Moines City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 15, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorliNG, J.

The controlling question is whether plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury. The immediate cause of plaintiff’s fall was a collision between an automobile (following and attempting to pass) and the overswing of the street ear as the street ear was turning into another street.

The car was a two-mán car, 35 or 40 feet long, provided with rear right-hand entrance and conductor’s station at such entrance. The route of the car was east on Walnut Street to Second Street, thence north on Second. The car was admitted to Second Street by means of a switch, which the motorman operated through the front…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Byron v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Kellow v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Jackson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Terrell v. Trimble CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Hillman v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Waterloo Savings Bank v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Petersen v. Chicago, Great Western Ry. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
  3. Edwards v. Des Moines Transit CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Chapman v. RedwineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API