Legal Opinion
Hines v. Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1997No. Nos. 95-17259, 95-17260PublishedCited by 334 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*267OPINION
LAY, Circuit Judge:
Gary Dale Hines, a death row inmate, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials employed by the San Quentin State Prison in California. Hines alleges, inter alia, that Steven Pearson, a prison guard, falsely charged him with a rule violation and that Stephen Szmaciarz, a hearing officer, falsely found Hines guilty of the infraction. Hines maintains that both officials acted in retaliation for his prior use of the prison grievance system.1 The parties agreed to try the case before a magistrate judge. A jury found for Hines against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by334 opinions
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
329 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.