Legal Opinion

Taranto v. North Slope Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1996No. S-6176PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Evelyn Donovan prepared and displayed a petition which stated that signatories had knowledge that Sheila Taranto had sold marijuana, cocaine and liquor. Taranto filed a defamation action in the superior court at Barrow against the North Slope Borough. The superior court granted the Borough’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Preliminary Facts

Appellant Sheila Taranto lives in Barrow where she owns a taxi cab business. Sometime during November 1991, Taranto became aware that a petition regarding her had been drafted and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Acevedo v. BurleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State, Department of Corrections v. HeiseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Rewire the BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. RepaskyAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ondrusek v. MurphyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API