Legal Opinion
Oko v. City of Cleveland
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 7, 2023No. 1:21-cv-02222Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Michael A. Oko, Case No. 1:21cv2222 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER City of Cleveland, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendants Currently pending is the Motion of Defendants City of Cleveland, John Combs, John Smith, and Michael Donegan for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 48.) Pro se Plaintiff Michael Oko did not file a Brief in Opposition. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. Facts Plaintiff Michael Oko (“Plaintiff’ or “Oko”) resides on East 160th Street in Cleveland, Ohio…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.