Legal Opinion
In Re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 1988No. 19-10993PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
The movant here seeks a determination that its claim against the debtor is properly treated as a postpetition claim so that the automatic stay does not apply. In the alternative, the movant seeks modification of the automatic stay to allow it to assert its claim against the debtor in state court.
I
The movant is Lavin Centrifuge, Inc. (“Lavin Centrifuge”) whose request that this chapter 11 bankruptcy case be dismissed was addressed in my opinion set forth in In re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc., 72 B.R. 900 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987) appeal pending. The relationship…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In the Matter of Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc., Debtors-Appellants. Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc. v. Ronald E. LittlefieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwartz v. Kursman (In Re Harry Levin, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re NAL Financial Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1999
- In Re Metro Transportation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Shields v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Lloyd Securities, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.