Legal Opinion
Townes v. City of St. Louis
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 6, 1996No. 4:94 CV 75 DDNPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
949 F.Supp. 731 (1996)
Valerie TOWNES, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant.
No. 4:94 CV 75 DDN.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
September 6, 1996.
Valerie Townes, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
James L. Matchefts, St. Louis City Counselor Office, St. Louis, MO, for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action is before the court sua sponte.[1] The parties have consented to the exercise of authority by a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). During a hearing held on October 27, 1995, the court gave notice to the parties that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hutchins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hutchins, Tiana v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Alexis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.