Shore v. Crail
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, P. J.
This is an appeal, on the judgment roll alone, by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover money allegedly due under an option to *738purchase contract after exercise of the option by defendant. The following material facts are disclosed by the findings: On or about December 1, 1936, defendant, who was then the owner of all the outstanding capital stock of the Hollywood Building & Loan Association sold and delivered the same to the plaintiff in consideration of the execution by plaintiff of an agreement with defendant whereby plaintiff granted defendant an option,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- North-Western Mutual Life Insurance v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Oakland RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Schlesinger v. BurlandNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Gruwell v. SeyboltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert E. Lee & Co. v. Commission of Public WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966