Legal Opinion
State Division of Human Rights v. University of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied in accordance with the following memorandum: Appellants appeal from an order of Special Term which granted complainant’s motion to enforce two subpoenas duces tecum issues by the private attorney of complainant Noble and which determined that the complaint, insofar as it charged the preferment of Mr. Hill over complainant, was not barred by the one-year period of limitation (Executive Law, § 297, subd 5). Complainant Noble is a perfusionist at Strong Memorial Hospital. She alleges that appellants unlawfully discriminated against her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Romano v. RomanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Russell Sage College v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Munger v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Whalen v. John P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- State Division of Human Rights v. Burroughs Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New York State National Organization for Women v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.