Farmers Protective Fire Insurance v. Portrum & Altman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Smith. DeKalb superior court. July 14, 1915.
1Per curiam
1. The burden of showing error in the judgment of the trial court to which exception is taken rests upon the plaintiff in error.
2. In this ease suit was brought on a policy of fire insurance, of which a copy was alleged to be attached to the petition. It was alleged that the company refused to pay the loss, “basing its refusal aforesaid on, an unjust and unwarranted assumption that the property had been vacant for more than sixty days before the fire, in violation of an alleged rule or by-law.” ' What purported to be a copy of the policy attached to the petition showed no such rule or by-law…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Richter v. CannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Beavers v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- McDougall v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975