Legal Opinion

Dandini v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1961No. Civ. 19540PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J. pro tem. *

This action, instituted by plaintiff to quiet title to certain real property, resulted in a judgment determining that defendants own an undivided one-half interest in the property and that plaintiff owns the other undivided one-half interest therein.

Plaintiff claims that defendants acquired and hold their oue-half interest solely as security for the payment of attorney fees and subject to a life estate owned by plaintiff.

The half interest in question, plaintiff received from her mother by will; the other half, from the same source, as trustee for her sister Emma…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Barnhart Aircraft, Inc. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Murphy Slough Assn. v. AvilaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. ScheinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API