Legal Opinion

State v. Burgos

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 15, 2009No. AC 29635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Edward Burgos, appeals from the judgments of conviction rendered by the trial court following his conditional pleas of nolo contendere under General Statutes § 54-94a.1 Because we conclude that the defendant’s pleas were not knowing and voluntary, we reverse the judgments of conviction and remand the cases to the trial court with direction to vacate both pleas and for further proceedings.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant. The defendant was charged in two separate criminal files. The first set of charges stemmed from an incident occurring…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. WinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. State v. GroppiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. State v. WinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LageConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. ClaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. State v. BurgosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API