Legal Opinion
Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. Ogden Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 17, 1977No. C-76-2063-CBRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF REMAND
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Pacific Far East Line, Inc. (“PFEL”), filed this action in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco on August 25, 1976, seeking damages according to proof from multiple defendants for breach of contract, including breach of express and implied warranties, and negligence. In its ninety cause of action complaint, PFEL also seeks punitive damages from Avondale Shipyards, Inc. (“Avondale”), and Ogden Corporation (“Ogden”) for willful and malicious breach.
Avondale, the central defendant herein, entered into a written…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilsey Poirrier v. Nicklos Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- New England Concrete Pipe Corporation v. D/c Systems of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Comind, Companhia De Seguros v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- Camacho v. Cove Trader, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Metropolitan Dade County v. One (1) Bronze CannonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.