Legal Opinion

Golden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1922No. 7064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for unlawfully operating a pool hall; punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars.

Before announcing ready for trial, appellant requested that he be furnished with a copy of the information against him. The bill shows that he had not been previously furnished one. The law 'declares that “he or his counsel may demand a copy, which shall be given at as early a day as possible.” (Code of Crim. Proc. Art. 554.) There is no impediment in the instant ease to the com pliance with this statute. It required no delay of the trial. It was the imperative duty of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Revill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Matheson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Ex Parte MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Hutto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Jeffery Willard Sprayberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Jeffery Willard Sprayberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API