Moreno v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
The Corpus Christi Court of Appeals wrote that it reversed the judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery “only because the Court of Criminal Appeals has held that on direct appeal the provisions of Article 26.04 are mandatory, that no objection needs to be made at trial, and that no *396showing of harm is necessary.”1 Moreno v. State, 653 S.W.2d 457 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).
The State, through its district attorney, would have us reexamine and overrule a generation of cases since Bennett v. State, 382 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.GrApp.1964) or,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Henson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clifton Erik Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Clifton Erik Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984