Legal Opinion

Revill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1919No. 5429PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant is charged by indictment with the offense of burglary. The indictment fails to conclude with the words: "against the peace and dignity of the State," and contains no equivalent declaration. The Constitution, Art. 5, Sec. 12, contains the following:

"All prosecutions shall be carried on in the name and by the authority of the State of Texas, and shall conclude `against the peace and dignity of the State.'"

This is an imperative command, and the failure to observe it renders the indictment void. Bird v. State, 37 Tex. Crim. 408; Harris' Constitution, p. 430.

The insufficiency of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Pabst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Rumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API