Legal Opinion
George Haiss Mfg. Co. v. Linkbelt Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1932No. Nos. 3948, 4439, 4685, 4697PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AVIS, District Judge.
These cases involve three distinct questions. A statement of the prior proceedings is necessary for the purpose of intelligently stating the issues involved in the present appeals.
George Haiss, claiming to be the inventor of a new and useful improvement in wagon loaders, on April 26, 1919, made formal application to the Commissioner of Patents of the United States for a patent thereon, and on June 29, 1929, letters patent of the United States No. 1,345,172 were duly issued to him. Subsequently, on or about August 15, 1921, the said Haiss surrendered the aforesaid letters…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Computing Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- National Folding-Box & Paper Co. v. Dayton Paper Novelty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1899
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'n v. SteblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964