Legal Opinion
National Folding-Box & Paper Co. v. Dayton Paper Novelty Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Decided July 10, 1899No. 4,524PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to enjoin the infringement of the second claim of letters patent Ao. 371,8W>, to Ritter, for an improvement in paper boxes. The patent has expired, and the case now only involves a question of damages. .Judge Sage held that the second claim was valid, and that it was infringed by certain boxes manufactured by the defendant. The ease was then referred to the special master to ascertain and state the number of boxes made, the number used, and the number sold by the said defendant company *992in infringement of the second claim of said letters patent, and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Duplex Printing-Press Co. v. Campbell Printing-Press & Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- State v. Port Royal & A. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1898
- Mosher v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wolfe v. National Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Levin Bros. v. Davis Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Gordon v. Turco-Halvah Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.