Legal Opinion
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 8, 1964No. 75Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
377 U.S. 476 (1964)
ARO MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL.
v.
CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT CO., INC.
No. 75.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 17, 1964.
Decided June 8, 1964.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
Charles Hicken argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was David Wolf.
Elliott I. Pollock argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan
Respondent Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., (CTR) acquired by assignment from the Automobile Body Research Corporation (AB) all rights for the territory of Massachusetts in United States…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited53 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.