Legal Opinion

Easkold v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1994No. 93-1676PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Appellant Donna Easkold appeals an order ruling that a tender of payment of the amount of a judgment was inadequate to stop the running of interest on that judgment, and that the post-judgment interest runs from the date of the jury verdict setting the amount of the damages owed. Elouise Rhodes cross appeals the trial court ruling that “post-judgment interest is not available on costs not awarded until after the appellate court’s mandate” reinstating the jury verdict in this ease. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Elouise Rhodes was injured in a ear accident with Donna…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. McBroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Rhodes v. EaskoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Devolder v. SandageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Smith v. DunningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amerace Corp. v. StallingsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Rockman v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API